Immigration surge by "conservative" Australian leader

When "conservative" Australian leader Tony Abbott came to power in 2013 he quickly restored our border security and stopped nearly all illegal boat arrivals. Problem solved.

But if you think Abbott is concerned about preserving the demographic character/integrity of Australia, then think again. He's just another open borders freak. Another man without identity. Another zombie.

Australian politics swings from the incompetent bleeding-heart Left, to the anarchistic free-market open-borders Right. There is no centre. There is no identity in Australian politics anymore. They have all been lobotomised and placed their brains on the altar of political correctness.

As Diana West wrote recently in Why Do Nations Extinguish Themselves:

"Who goes to work, pours a cup of coffee and makes these suicidal decisions?"

Five million visas into Australia this year likely to set new records
Australia is set to issue, for the first time, more than 5 million visas this year, presenting a range and scale of policy challenges not seen since World War II.

Surging numbers of students, tourists and workers on short-term visas mean that as many as 1.9 million foreigners are likely to be in the country at any one time over the course of 2015, according to Michael Pezzullo, Secretary of the Department of Immigration.

The number of traditional permanent migrants is also surging, with this year's intake likely to surpass the existing record of 185,000, which was set in 1969.

... Mr Pezzullo ... pointed to a rapid shift in the ethnic composition of new migrants away from Europe towards east and southern Asia.

The number of Chinese-born Australians has more than tripled to almost 450,000 in the space of two decades, he said.

Those born in India has risen more than four-fold in that time, to almost 400,000.

Those numbers compare to about 1.2 million born in Britain and more than 600,000 in New Zealand, as part of an overall foreign-born population of 6.6 million.

The huge influx means a higher proportion of the population was born overseas than at any time since the gold rushes of the 19th century.
File under: zombies.

Kenyan "brother" says Obama resembles Frank Marshall Davis

A month ago I watched Dreams From My Real Father and was shocked that Obama resembles his Hawaiian neighbourhood communist mentor Frank Marshall Davis far more than he does his supposed Kenyan father. That's a big topic, so I'll leave that for another time.

But meanwhile, Obama's alleged half-brother Malik Obama was recently interviewed by Joel Gilbert (who sent Malik a copy of Dreams From My Real Father). Malik is disillusioned by Obama's disinterest in his Kenyan family and now even questions whether Obama is a blood relative. Malik said that Obama resembles Frank Marshall Davis and doesn't look like Obama Snr.

Here is the transcript.
JG: So, do you think that Barack looks like Frank Marshall Davis - this is a man that he said raised him - more than your father?

MO: There’s a great resemblance. I think Frank Marshall Davis and Barack, they look alike. Some kind of moles I see on his face and Frank, he has those too. There’s a resemblance.

JG: And does he resemble your father?

MO: Not really, I don’t. They talk, they say about the years [ears?], but no. No. Your movie definitely puts a lot of questions in my mind.
JG: Well would you like to see or do a DNA test one day to know for sure?

MO: That would really prove whether we are related or not. Yes. I would be willing to do that. I don’t know how I’d deal with it, if it really came out that he really is a fraud or a con.

JG: It might be the reason why he made such a big deal about you politically, but personally he doesn’t feel the bond.

MO: I’m agreeing. Yeah, I agree with that because it’s hard to understand how somebody can make such an about turn and make a big play about where he comes from and then once he gets what he gets, wants nothing to do with that place anymore. We need an explanation and if you can provide the explanation, it would be better for all of us so we won’t be hanging, hoping for nothing. That’s what I really feel for my people is ‘cause they keep hoping. Maybe they’re hoping for nothing. Cause he doesn’t mention it any more where he comes from or who his relatives are. He doesn’t say any of those things any more. It’s really disappointing, Joel, but that’s life. We live with it and move on and we wait for the truth to come out.
Via Noisy Room.

File under: the undocumented president.

It's All About Muhammad (new illustrated book)

F.W. Burleigh explains why he wrote the book:
In order to write It's All About Muhammad I had to read a lot more than the Koran. In all, I soldiered through 20,000 pages of the original source material. I also read numerous secondary works by Western scholars and others. (I now have a physical library of nearly 500 books related to this subject!) From this study I extracted the real story about Muhammad, and it is presented in this book in a way that has never been done before.

For one, though it is a biography the book reads like a true crime story, for in fact Muhammad committed just about every crime listed by the International Criminal Court as constituting a crime against humanity--all provable from Muslim literature. I included 47 pages of double-column chapter notes citing--and often heavily quoting--the original sources. This is to show that nothing in the book is invented.

Additionally, the book is illustrated, with 25 black and white illustrations, half of them "depicting" atrocities Muhammad committed.

This is a default book. Following 9/11, year after year went by and no one wrote it even though it was clear it needed to be done. Muslims follow in the footsteps of Muhammad. Islam--what he created--is now a global threat. Everyone is threatened by it. But nobody wrote it so finally I had to do it. My biography is a simple statement of a fact. F. W. Burleigh: a man who saw a book that needed to be written and wrote it.

More info at Citizen Warrior, Good Reads, and It's All About Muhammad.

Zenga Books has the Table of Contents, Introduction, and Chapter 23 (Qurayza genocide).

File under: crimes against humanity.

China building 'Great Wall of Sand' in South China Sea

China building 'great wall of sand' in South China Sea:
China's land reclamation is creating a "great wall of sand" in the South China Sea, a top US official says, leading to "serious questions" on its intentions.

US Pacific Fleet Commander Admiral Harry Harris made the comments in a speech in Australia on Tuesday night.

He said by pumping sand on to coral reefs and adding concrete, China had created "over 4 sq km (1.5 sq miles) of artificial landmass".

China has overlapping claims with neighbours in the South China Sea.

It has been reclaiming land in contested waters - something it said last year was "totally justified" as it had "sovereignty" over the area.

In recent months images have emerged of Chinese construction on reefs in the Spratly Islands to create artificial islands with facilities that could potentially be for military use, including an air strip.

Several nations, including Vietnam, the Philippines and Taiwan, also claim ownership of territory in the Spratly Islands.

Adm Harris described China's land reclamation as "unprecedented".

"China is building artificial land by pumping sand on to live coral reefs - some of them submerged - and paving over them with concrete. China has now created over 4 sq km (1.5 sq miles) of artificial landmass," he said.

"China is creating a great wall of sand with dredges and bulldozers over the course of months."

He said that considering China's "pattern of provocative actions towards smaller claimant states" in the South China Sea, the scope of the building raised "serious questions about Chinese intentions".

File under: Chinese goods are not cheap.

Asians group themselves racially for Australian election

Here in the recent New South Wales state election, there was an interesting group of candidates for our upper house.

Very little is known about the group's policies or ideology, so we can presume it was aimed squarely at the Asian vote, particularly the Chinese.

This is sign of what to expect from Australia's rapidly growing Asian population i.e. they will not hesitate to identify and vote racially.

This is particularly true of the Chinese, who generally retain a fierce identity with the "motherland".

And the majority of Australia's immigrants now come from China (and India).

When the Chinese/Asians begin to assert themselves politically, you can be sure the first policy they will throw in the bin is the diversity doctrine. They will skew our immigration further towards Asians, and away from those pesky white folks.

Diversity (on a mass scale) is a pathological, post-traumatic, post WW2, white man affliction. No other race believes in it (except temporarily to further colonise white countries).

As an example of what the Chinese think about their growing presence in Australia, look at how they named this magazine for Chinese-Australians:

File under: kin preference.